BenchAtlas

Benchmarks / Agentic Coding

SWE-bench

agent + model

Resolving real GitHub issues from popular Python (and multilingual/multimodal) repositories. Results are agent+model systems — the scaffold matters.

maintained by SWE-bench · www.swebench.com · 400 observations on record

Agent harness required — results on this benchmark measure whole agent+model systems (scaffold, tools, budgets), not bare models. Scores here are never merged with bare-model numbers, and only standardized canonical harnesses can carry a family score into the BenchAtlas Index.

Versions

6 versions
VersionTasks
SWE-bench Verified current
swe-bench-verified
500
SWE-bench bash-only
swe-bench-bash-only
SWE-bench (full test split)
swe-bench-full
2,294
SWE-bench Lite
swe-bench-lite
300
SWE-bench Multilingual
swe-bench-multilingual
SWE-bench Multimodal
swe-bench-multimodal

Current leaderboard

SWE-bench Verified · Resolved rate · top 25 of 143 systems
7578818386
Epoch Inspect harness + Claude Opus 4.7
83.5
Epoch Inspect harness + GPT 5.5 Pre Release
80.6
Epoch Inspect harness + Gemini 3.5 Flash
79.3
live-SWE-agent + Claude Opus 4.5 20251101
79.2
Sonar Foundation Agent + Claude Opus 4.5
79.2
Epoch Inspect harness + Claude Opus 4.6
78.7
Epoch Inspect harness + GLM 5.2
78.7
Epoch Inspect harness + Deepseek V4 Pro
77.6
live-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 Pro Preview
77.4
Epoch Inspect harness + Qwen3 7
77.3
#SystemResolved rate %
1agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Claude Opus 4.7max effort
Anthropic
83.5%
2agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + GPT 5.5 Pre Releasexhigh effort
OpenAI
80.6%
3agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Gemini 3.5 Flashhigh effort
Google DeepMind
79.3%
4agent + model live-SWE-agent + Claude Opus 4.5 20251101
Anthropic
79.2%
5agent + model Sonar Foundation Agent + Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic
79.2%
6agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
78.7%
7agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + GLM 5.2max effort
Z.ai
78.7%
8agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Deepseek V4 Promax effort
DeepSeek
77.6%
9agent + model live-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Google DeepMind
77.4%
10agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Qwen3 7max effort
Alibaba
77.3%
11agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + GPT 5.4 (2026-03-05)high effort
OpenAI
76.9%
12agent + model mini-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 Opus
Unknown
76.8%
13agent + model EPAM AI/Run Developer Agent v20250719 + Claude Sonnet 4 20250514
Anthropic
76.8%
14agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Qwen3 6 Max Preview
Alibaba
76.7%
15agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Claude Opus 4.5 20251101
Anthropic
76.7%
16agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Kimi K2 6
Moonshot AI
76.7%
17agent + model mini-SWE-agent + Minimax M2 5
MiniMax
75.8%
18agent + model mini-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Google DeepMind
75.8%
19agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Customtools
Google DeepMind
75.6%
20agent + model mini-SWE-agent + Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
75.6%
21agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Google DeepMind
75.4%
22agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
75.2%
23agent + model Harness AI + Claude Sonnet 4 20250514
Anthropic
74.8%
24agent + model Sonar Foundation Agent + Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
74.8%
25agent + model Epoch Inspect harness + GPT 5.3 Codexhigh effort
OpenAI
74.8%

One row per evaluated system — reasoning-effort variants rank separately. Where a system has attr variants for this version (eval splits, style control), only the canonical variant is ranked: split=semi_private, style_control=true, or the unsplit run.

Source agreement

where evaluating organizations agree — and don't
overlap 13 systemsrank correlation 0.81mean |Δ| 2.49max |Δ| 5.45
most contested: Claude 3.7 Sonnet 20250219 (-5.45) · GPT 5 Mini (2025-08-07) (+4.87) · Gemini 3 Pro Preview (-4.47)

Possible reasons: different agent harnesses ran the tasks; verification differs (independent vs unverified); run setting 'attempts' differs (— vs 1).