BenchAtlas

Benchmarks / Multimodal

VISTA

Visual-language understanding benchmark (Scale Labs).

maintained by Scale (Scale Labs) · 63 observations on record

Versions

1 version
VersionTasks
VISTA current
vista

Current leaderboard

VISTA · Accuracy · top 25 of 63 systems
4750535659
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental (March 2025)
54.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06.05
54.6
GPT 5.4 Pro (2026-03-05)
53.9
GPT 5 Pro (2025-10-06)
52.4
o4-mini (high) (April 2025)
51.8
o4-mini (medium) (April 2025)
51.7
o3 Pro (high) (June 2025)
51.6
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
51.5
GPT 5.4 (2026-03-05)
50.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May 06 2025)
50.8
#SystemAccuracy %
1Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental (March 2025)
Google
54.6%
53.256.1
2Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06.05
Google DeepMind
54.6%
54.155.2
3GPT 5.4 Pro (2026-03-05)
OpenAI
53.9%
51.955.9
4GPT 5 Pro (2025-10-06)
OpenAI
52.4%
51.353.5
5o4-mini (high) (April 2025)
OpenAI
51.8%
51.252.4
6o4-mini (medium) (April 2025)
OpenAI
51.7%
50.652.7
7o3 Pro (high) (June 2025)
OpenAI
51.6%
51.451.9
8Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Google DeepMind
51.5%
50.752.3
9GPT 5.4 (2026-03-05)max effort
OpenAI
50.9%
49.152.6
10Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May 06 2025)
Google
50.8%
50.251.4
11GPT 5 Mini (2025-08-07)
OpenAI
50.4%
48.152.7
12o3 (high) (April 2025)
OpenAI
50.1%
48.951.2
13GPT 5 (2025-08-07)
OpenAI
49.7%
48.750.7
14o3 (medium) (April 2025)
OpenAI
49.6%
48.950.3
15Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (May 2025)
Google
49.1%
48.849.5
16Claude Sonnet 4.5 20250929thinking
Anthropic
48.8%
47.150.4
17Claude Opus 4.1 20250805thinking
Anthropic
48.4%
48.048.9
18Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Feb 2025)thinking
Anthropic
48.2%
47.548.9
19o1 Pro (March 2025)
OpenAI
47.3%
45.549.1
20Gemini 2.5 Flash (April 2025)
Google
47.0%
45.748.3
21Claude Opus 4thinking
Anthropic
47.0%
46.047.9
22Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Google
46.9%
44.249.7
23GPT 5.2 (2025-12-11)
OpenAI
46.6%
44.448.9
24Claude Opus 4.5 20251101thinking
Anthropic
46.4%
46.446.5
25Claude Opus 4.6max effort
Anthropic
46.1%
45.846.3

One row per evaluated system — reasoning-effort variants rank separately.